首页> 外文OA文献 >Does state control affect managerial incentives? Evidence from china's publicly listed firms
【2h】

Does state control affect managerial incentives? Evidence from china's publicly listed firms

机译:国家控制是否会影响管理激励?来自中国上市公司的证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Using data for 1203 publicly listed firms in China during 1999–2002, this paper empirically investigates whether and to what extent state control affects managerial incentives, including managerial compensation and CEO turnover. The paper finds that CEO turnover is negatively related to both current and lagged firm performance as measured by ROA and RPE (Relative Performance Evaluation) for non‐state‐controlled firms, while insensitive to performance measures for state‐controlled firms. In addition, CEO compensation is positively related to firm performance, but state ownership and control weaken this positive relation. Moreover, state control reduces the effectiveness of internal governance mechanisms such as the board of directors and supervisory committee. Overall, empirical results in the paper indicate that state ownership and control weaken managerial incentives and internal monitoring among publicly listed firms in China.
机译:本文利用1999-2002年间中国1203家上市公司的数据,实证研究了国家控制是否以及在多大程度上影响了管理人员的激励,包括管理人员的薪酬和CEO的离职。本文发现,对于非国有控股公司,ROA和RPE(相对绩效评估)衡量,CEO流动率与当前和落后的公司绩效均呈负相关,而对国有控股公司的绩效指标不敏感。此外,首席执行官的薪酬与公司绩效成正相关,但国家所有权和控制权削弱了这种积极关系。此外,国家控制降低了董事会和监事会等内部治理机制的有效性。总体而言,本文的经验结果表明,国有制和控制权削弱了中国上市公司的管理激励和内部监控。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lin, C; Su, D;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2009
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号